<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tomshardware redeems themselves with new flash versus hard drive energy efficiency tests</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.formortals.com/tomshardware-redeems-themselves-with-new-flash-versus-hard-drive-energy-efficiency-tests/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.formortals.com/tomshardware-redeems-themselves-with-new-flash-versus-hard-drive-energy-efficiency-tests/</link>
	<description>Because technology isn&#039;t just for geeks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 20:02:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4.0</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/tomshardware-redeems-themselves-with-new-flash-versus-hard-drive-energy-efficiency-tests/comment-page-1/#comment-3175</link>
		<dc:creator>4.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=83#comment-3175</guid>
		<description>Your post really helps in promoting energy efficient technologies. Great!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your post really helps in promoting energy efficient technologies. Great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Horrible analysis claims flash drives consume more power &#124; Technology for Mortals</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/tomshardware-redeems-themselves-with-new-flash-versus-hard-drive-energy-efficiency-tests/comment-page-1/#comment-1652</link>
		<dc:creator>Horrible analysis claims flash drives consume more power &#124; Technology for Mortals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 11:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=83#comment-1652</guid>
		<description>[...] 7/14/2008 -&#160;Tomshardware redeems themselves with new flash versus hard drive energy efficiency testsLots of people are talking about Tomshardware&#8217;s latest claim that SSD (Solid State Disk) flash [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 7/14/2008 -&nbsp;Tomshardware redeems themselves with new flash versus hard drive energy efficiency testsLots of people are talking about Tomshardware&#8217;s latest claim that SSD (Solid State Disk) flash [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technology for Mortals &#187; Tomshardware botches Intel Atom energy efficiency tests badly</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/tomshardware-redeems-themselves-with-new-flash-versus-hard-drive-energy-efficiency-tests/comment-page-1/#comment-1635</link>
		<dc:creator>Technology for Mortals &#187; Tomshardware botches Intel Atom energy efficiency tests badly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 02:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=83#comment-1635</guid>
		<description>[...] praising Tomshardware for doing a good job fixing their flash storage efficiency article, I must point out that Tomshardware&#8217;s made another horrendous error by claiming that and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] praising Tomshardware for doing a good job fixing their flash storage efficiency article, I must point out that Tomshardware&#8217;s made another horrendous error by claiming that and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

