<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Here is why Microsoft Silverlight is superior to Adobe Flash</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.formortals.com/here-is-why-microsoft-silverlight-is-superior-to-adobe-flash/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.formortals.com/here-is-why-microsoft-silverlight-is-superior-to-adobe-flash/</link>
	<description>Because technology isn&#039;t just for geeks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 20:02:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Ou</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/here-is-why-microsoft-silverlight-is-superior-to-adobe-flash/comment-page-1/#comment-3659</link>
		<dc:creator>George Ou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 08:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=169#comment-3659</guid>
		<description>Yeah, Microsoft Live was hosting that file and they broke the link.  Oh well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Microsoft Live was hosting that file and they broke the link.  Oh well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/here-is-why-microsoft-silverlight-is-superior-to-adobe-flash/comment-page-1/#comment-3657</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 04:17:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=169#comment-3657</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s all great but doesnt help if you can&#039;t see the silverlight version! Broken link :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s all great but doesnt help if you can&#8217;t see the silverlight version! Broken link <img src='http://www.formortals.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin James</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/here-is-why-microsoft-silverlight-is-superior-to-adobe-flash/comment-page-1/#comment-2782</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 15:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=169#comment-2782</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-2780&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Fabricio Biazzotto  &lt;/a&gt; 

The Linux version of Silverlight is as open source friendly as Mono is. Depending on your stance on Mono, that means either &quot;friendly&quot; or &quot;unfriendly&quot;.

J.Ja</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-2780" rel="nofollow">@Fabricio Biazzotto  </a> </p>
<p>The Linux version of Silverlight is as open source friendly as Mono is. Depending on your stance on Mono, that means either &#8220;friendly&#8221; or &#8220;unfriendly&#8221;.</p>
<p>J.Ja</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Ou</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/here-is-why-microsoft-silverlight-is-superior-to-adobe-flash/comment-page-1/#comment-2781</link>
		<dc:creator>George Ou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 14:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=169#comment-2781</guid>
		<description>Silverlight does work in Linux.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Silverlight does work in Linux.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fabricio Biazzotto</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/here-is-why-microsoft-silverlight-is-superior-to-adobe-flash/comment-page-1/#comment-2780</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabricio Biazzotto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 12:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=169#comment-2780</guid>
		<description>What about other OS? Is there a Linux version of Microsoft Silverlight? I don&#039;t think so, and if it would exist it wouldn&#039;t be Open Source friendly like Flash is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about other OS? Is there a Linux version of Microsoft Silverlight? I don&#8217;t think so, and if it would exist it wouldn&#8217;t be Open Source friendly like Flash is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eMachines wins race to bottom on Nettops &#124; Technology for Mortals</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/here-is-why-microsoft-silverlight-is-superior-to-adobe-flash/comment-page-1/#comment-2110</link>
		<dc:creator>eMachines wins race to bottom on Nettops &#124; Technology for Mortals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 17:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=169#comment-2110</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YouTube using Silverlight instead of Flash for March Madness &#124; Technology for Mortals</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/here-is-why-microsoft-silverlight-is-superior-to-adobe-flash/comment-page-1/#comment-1669</link>
		<dc:creator>YouTube using Silverlight instead of Flash for March Madness &#124; Technology for Mortals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 00:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=169#comment-1669</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technology for Mortals &#187; Asus Eee PC 1000HE netbook review</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/here-is-why-microsoft-silverlight-is-superior-to-adobe-flash/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Technology for Mortals &#187; Asus Eee PC 1000HE netbook review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 11:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=169#comment-3</guid>
		<description>[...] Flash has no chance with 720P and barely handles 480P widescreen content on Hulu.com.&#160; You can compare all three embedded players here.&#160; The popularity of netbooks will hopefully get Microsoft and Adobe to optimize their video [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Flash has no chance with 720P and barely handles 480P widescreen content on Hulu.com.&nbsp; You can compare all three embedded players here.&nbsp; The popularity of netbooks will hopefully get Microsoft and Adobe to optimize their video [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bagha</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/here-is-why-microsoft-silverlight-is-superior-to-adobe-flash/comment-page-1/#comment-1430</link>
		<dc:creator>Bagha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=169#comment-1430</guid>
		<description>I think it has to do with the fact that Flash is vector painting program-turned animation program-turned development platform-turned video embedder, whereas Silverlight was designed from the ground up to be a development platform with video embedding. In my mind, taking an old platform through so many phases is bound to give you a weaker and less-stable system. This is why I was happy about the introduction of MS Silverlight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it has to do with the fact that Flash is vector painting program-turned animation program-turned development platform-turned video embedder, whereas Silverlight was designed from the ground up to be a development platform with video embedding. In my mind, taking an old platform through so many phases is bound to give you a weaker and less-stable system. This is why I was happy about the introduction of MS Silverlight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: notgonnatellya</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/here-is-why-microsoft-silverlight-is-superior-to-adobe-flash/comment-page-1/#comment-1425</link>
		<dc:creator>notgonnatellya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 17:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=169#comment-1425</guid>
		<description>I should have said the reason that Silverlight has no known (or very few) vulnerabilities is because of it&#039;s limited market share.  Obviously vulnerabilities exist whether they&#039;re known or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should have said the reason that Silverlight has no known (or very few) vulnerabilities is because of it&#8217;s limited market share.  Obviously vulnerabilities exist whether they&#8217;re known or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

