<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Technology for Mortals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.formortals.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.formortals.com</link>
	<description>Because technology isn&#039;t just for geeks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:05:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Tomshardware redeems themselves with new flash versus hard drive energy efficiency tests by 4.0</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/tomshardware-redeems-themselves-with-new-flash-versus-hard-drive-energy-efficiency-tests/comment-page-1/#comment-3175</link>
		<dc:creator>4.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=83#comment-3175</guid>
		<description>Your post really helps in promoting energy efficient technologies. Great!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your post really helps in promoting energy efficient technologies. Great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on BlackBerry Enterprise Server 5 installation nightmares by Digital Lemmonade &#187; Blog Archive &#187; BlackBerry Server installation issues</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/blackberry-enterprise-server-5-installation-nightmares/comment-page-1/#comment-3174</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Lemmonade &#187; Blog Archive &#187; BlackBerry Server installation issues</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 21:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=618#comment-3174</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.formortals.com/blackberry-enterprise-server-5-installation-nightmares/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.formortals.com/blackberry-enterprise-server-5-installation-nightmares/" rel="nofollow">http://www.formortals.com/blackberry-enterprise-server-5-installation-nightmares/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Microsoft&#8217;s Achille&#8217;s Heel by Jed</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/microsofts-achilles-heel/comment-page-1/#comment-3173</link>
		<dc:creator>Jed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 18:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=16#comment-3173</guid>
		<description>And this is the reason I like www.formortals.com. Surprising posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And this is the reason I like <a href="http://www.formortals.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.formortals.com</a>. Surprising posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An introduction to VLAN Trunking by George Ou</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/an-introduction-to-vlan-trunking/comment-page-1/#comment-3172</link>
		<dc:creator>George Ou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 16:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=670#comment-3172</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t agree with that advice Phil.  It might be better to use physical networks in theory, but it&#039;s so darn impractical that you end up sacrificing security because of cost considerations.  There&#039;s a finite budget for security and it&#039;s better to spend the money elsewhere than trying to stick with a small theoretical advantage to physical network separation.

VLANs are only insecure if the switch gets hacked (fairly unlikely if locked down correctly), or if you use VLAN 1 or whatever the native VLAN is on the switch which opens the possibility for VLAN hopping.  But if you implement VLANs and layer 2 security correctly, VLAN security is the least of your worries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t agree with that advice Phil.  It might be better to use physical networks in theory, but it&#8217;s so darn impractical that you end up sacrificing security because of cost considerations.  There&#8217;s a finite budget for security and it&#8217;s better to spend the money elsewhere than trying to stick with a small theoretical advantage to physical network separation.</p>
<p>VLANs are only insecure if the switch gets hacked (fairly unlikely if locked down correctly), or if you use VLAN 1 or whatever the native VLAN is on the switch which opens the possibility for VLAN hopping.  But if you implement VLANs and layer 2 security correctly, VLAN security is the least of your worries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Replaced lost cell phone with cheap Nokia 1661 by Francine</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/replaced-lost-cell-phone-with-cheap-nokia-1661/comment-page-1/#comment-3171</link>
		<dc:creator>Francine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 04:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=761#comment-3171</guid>
		<description>Thank you, thank you!  Worked like a charm!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, thank you!  Worked like a charm!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An introduction to VLAN Trunking by Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/an-introduction-to-vlan-trunking/comment-page-1/#comment-3170</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 20:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=670#comment-3170</guid>
		<description>You really should mention that VLANS have security considerations of their own. From the SANS website:

Recommendations

Try not to use VLANs as a mechanism for enforcing security policy. They are great for segmenting networks, reducing broadcasts and collisions and so forth, but not as a security tool. 

If you MUST use them in a security context, ensure that the trunking ports have a unique native VLAN number.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You really should mention that VLANS have security considerations of their own. From the SANS website:</p>
<p>Recommendations</p>
<p>Try not to use VLANs as a mechanism for enforcing security policy. They are great for segmenting networks, reducing broadcasts and collisions and so forth, but not as a security tool. </p>
<p>If you MUST use them in a security context, ensure that the trunking ports have a unique native VLAN number.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Problems with Lingo VoIP phone service by chuck</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/problems-with-lingo-voip-phone-service/comment-page-1/#comment-3168</link>
		<dc:creator>chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 17:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=70#comment-3168</guid>
		<description>When trying to call us some people always receive message that call cannot be completed or that the number is not working. That is when they are calling from most traditional phone service I think. They can reach our number with no problems when calling from cell phones. It is not all land based line phones that have problems reaching our number...just those two that we know of but now many do we not know about??? This has happened since we switched to Lingo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When trying to call us some people always receive message that call cannot be completed or that the number is not working. That is when they are calling from most traditional phone service I think. They can reach our number with no problems when calling from cell phones. It is not all land based line phones that have problems reaching our number&#8230;just those two that we know of but now many do we not know about??? This has happened since we switched to Lingo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Implementing VLAN trunking by Bob Caulk</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/implementing-vlan-trunking/comment-page-1/#comment-3167</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Caulk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 22:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=669#comment-3167</guid>
		<description>Michelle Obama gave advice. She did not give advise. Someone could as her to advise . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michelle Obama gave advice. She did not give advise. Someone could as her to advise . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on BlackBerry Enterprise Server 5 installation nightmares by Peter Barrett</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/blackberry-enterprise-server-5-installation-nightmares/comment-page-1/#comment-3164</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Barrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 10:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=618#comment-3164</guid>
		<description>Just thought I&#039;d drop a line to say &quot;thanks&quot; for this article.  We are currently running an evaluation of BES 5 installed on Windows Server 2008, and experienced the issue of not being able to connect to the web console.  After finding the article and following the suggestions it is now working fine, so once again thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just thought I&#8217;d drop a line to say &#8220;thanks&#8221; for this article.  We are currently running an evaluation of BES 5 installed on Windows Server 2008, and experienced the issue of not being able to connect to the web console.  After finding the article and following the suggestions it is now working fine, so once again thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Review of The Evoluent Vertical Mouse by Justin James</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/review-of-the-evoluent-vertical-mouse/comment-page-1/#comment-3163</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 22:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=150#comment-3163</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-3157&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Mike Perry  &lt;/a&gt; 

Mike -

Send me an email at j_james [at] mindspring [dot] com

J.Ja</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-3157" rel="nofollow">@Mike Perry  </a> </p>
<p>Mike -</p>
<p>Send me an email at j_james [at] mindspring [dot] com</p>
<p>J.Ja</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
