<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Technology for Mortals &#187; Adobe Flash</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.formortals.com/category/internet/adobe-flash/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.formortals.com</link>
	<description>Because technology isn&#039;t just for geeks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 06:16:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>YouTube using Silverlight instead of Flash for March Madness</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/youtube-using-silverlight-instead-of-flash-for-march-madness/</link>
		<comments>http://www.formortals.com/youtube-using-silverlight-instead-of-flash-for-march-madness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 07:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Ou</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Adobe Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Silverlight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It appears that YouTube is using Silverlight instead of Flash video for March Madness.  That&#8217;s awesome news for netbook owners and lower end computers because Silverlight is so much more CPU friendly than Flash video.  Now if YouTube will convert the rest of the site over, at least for all of the 720P content, that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.formortals.com/youtube-using-silverlight-instead-of-flash-for-march-madness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Here is why Microsoft Silverlight is superior to Adobe Flash</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/here-is-why-microsoft-silverlight-is-superior-to-adobe-flash/</link>
		<comments>http://www.formortals.com/here-is-why-microsoft-silverlight-is-superior-to-adobe-flash/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 04:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Ou</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Adobe Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Silverlight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a good test for a netbook to run to show that 720P Silverlight works on a slow netbook while Adobe Flash 720p will not. Oh and what do you know, this even plays fine in Google Chrome. This same clip on YouTube in Adobe Flash 720P won&#8217;t work on any low end graphics [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.formortals.com/here-is-why-microsoft-silverlight-is-superior-to-adobe-flash/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

