<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Technology for Mortals &#187; Virtualization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.formortals.com/category/information-technology/virtualization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.formortals.com</link>
	<description>Because technology isn&#039;t just for geeks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 06:16:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Novell&#8217;s Patents and Why CDTN Holdings Wants Them.</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/novells-patents-and-why-cdtn-holdings-wants-them/</link>
		<comments>http://www.formortals.com/novells-patents-and-why-cdtn-holdings-wants-them/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 01:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Baumli</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Backup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=1396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The web was a buzz earlier today with news that Microsoft wasn&#8217;t the only company being involved in CDTN Holdings and some including ZDNet and ComputerWorld blogger Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols tried to speculate just what patents each of the member companies of CDTN Holdings would want and why. First many thought that VMware would jump [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.formortals.com/novells-patents-and-why-cdtn-holdings-wants-them/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to perform a P2V conversion for FreeBSD to run on Hyper-V</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/how-to-perform-a-p2v-conversion-for-freebsd-to-run-on-hyper-v/</link>
		<comments>http://www.formortals.com/how-to-perform-a-p2v-conversion-for-freebsd-to-run-on-hyper-v/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 08:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FreeBSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hyper-V]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Server 2008]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=1062</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of my big projects with my personal server setup, was to turn my current physical FreeBSD server into a Hyper-V VM. Why would I do this? Don&#8217;t ask, because I don&#8217;t want to start a religous war here&#8230; let&#8217;s just say that as much as I like FreeBSD for a lot of purposes, I [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.formortals.com/how-to-perform-a-p2v-conversion-for-freebsd-to-run-on-hyper-v/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VirtualBox error 1603: &#8220;Installation of MSI failed.</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/virtualbox-error-1603-installation-of-msi-failed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.formortals.com/virtualbox-error-1603-installation-of-msi-failed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 02:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Charles N. Burns</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s happened on several of my systems with every VirtualBox release since 3.0: &#8220;VirtualBox Setup Ended Prematurely.&#8221; The suggestions I found online didn&#8217;t help. Here is a quick and simple solution. VirtualBox doesn&#8217;t uninstall its previous version&#8217;s device drivers, and the old and new seem to conflict.  The next time you install the latest release, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.formortals.com/virtualbox-error-1603-installation-of-msi-failed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SCVMM&#8217;s P2V functionality: nothin&#8217; but net!</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/scvmms-p2v-functionality-nothin-but-net/</link>
		<comments>http://www.formortals.com/scvmms-p2v-functionality-nothin-but-net/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 06:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This weekend I did my first P2V (physical-to-virtual) conversion of a machine using SCVMM 2008 (System Center Virtual Machine Manager). I expected the worst. Instead, I got a really pleasant experience. It worked like a charm, so long as the right ports were opened and you knew the username/password of a user who is a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.formortals.com/scvmms-p2v-functionality-nothin-but-net/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Technology on a honeymoon</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/technology-on-a-honeymoon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.formortals.com/technology-on-a-honeymoon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 06:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I got back from my honeymoon last week. Throughout the course of the trip, technology played a huge role, despite my not being &#8220;on the job&#8221;. Sadly, there were a ton of tech failures that simply should not have happened, which made the trip less enjoyable and relaxing. Here&#8217;s a roundup of those failures, and where [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.formortals.com/technology-on-a-honeymoon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two AMD Shanghai processors beaten by a single Intel i7-965</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/two-amd-shanghai-processors-beaten-by-a-single-intel-i7-965/</link>
		<comments>http://www.formortals.com/two-amd-shanghai-processors-beaten-by-a-single-intel-i7-965/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 06:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Ou</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AMD had much to celebration last week as they managed to beat Intel&#8217;s Nehalem-EP to the mainstream two-socket server market with Shanghai.  AMD took a lead in SPECjbb, SPECweb, SPECfp, and Virtualization Nested Paging for the server market and it looked like they might have had 2 months of breathing room to before Nehalem-EP arrives [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.formortals.com/two-amd-shanghai-processors-beaten-by-a-single-intel-i7-965/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>68</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AMD Shanghai 45nm launch &#8211; Server benchmarks roundup</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/amd-shanghai-45nm-launch-server-benchmarks-roundup/</link>
		<comments>http://www.formortals.com/amd-shanghai-45nm-launch-server-benchmarks-roundup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 05:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Ou</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AMD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AMD launched its 45nm Shanghai processors today for the server market ahead of Intel&#8217;s Nehalem processor launch.&#160; AMD lists a series of benchmarks here but they omit many of the better results from Intel.&#160; To get the full official results, here are the benchmarks based on the best scores available from AMD and Intel as [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.formortals.com/amd-shanghai-45nm-launch-server-benchmarks-roundup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

