<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Technology for Mortals &#187; Via</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.formortals.com/category/companies/via/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.formortals.com</link>
	<description>Because technology isn&#039;t just for geeks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 06:16:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Tomshardware botches Intel Atom energy efficiency tests badly</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/tomshardware-botches-intel-atom-energy-efficiency-tests-badly/</link>
		<comments>http://www.formortals.com/tomshardware-botches-intel-atom-energy-efficiency-tests-badly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 10:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Ou</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benchmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Via]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=84</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Update 8/20/2008 &#8211; I need to fix my mistake because I quoted some initial informal numbers from Jack that didn&#8217;t include the 3.5&#8243; HDD or dual-threaded tests.  Now that the I have his full data set, I&#8217;m need to make some corrections.  I apologize for my mistake and I will fix it below, but my insistance that Tomshardware is off [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.formortals.com/tomshardware-botches-intel-atom-energy-efficiency-tests-badly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Intel&#8217;s Atom CPU flexes multithreading muscle</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/intels-atom-cpu-flexes-multithreading-muscle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.formortals.com/intels-atom-cpu-flexes-multithreading-muscle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 23:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Ou</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Via]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Intel&#8217;s new sub-2.5 watt Atom CPU (codenamed Silverthorne) is showing it can run two process threads at the same time better than competing processors.  The Atom&#8217;s hyperthreading feature (in-order SMT) allows the single-core processor to be seen as two logical processors by an operating system.  When both processors are used whenever more than one task [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.formortals.com/intels-atom-cpu-flexes-multithreading-muscle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

