<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Technology for Mortals &#187; Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.formortals.com/category/companies/google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.formortals.com</link>
	<description>Because technology isn&#039;t just for geeks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 06:16:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google Android 6 stage update process</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/google-android-6-stage-update-process/</link>
		<comments>http://www.formortals.com/google-android-6-stage-update-process/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 10:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Ou</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=1571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I bought a new HTC Nexus One (brown with US warranty) last week and it came with a custom Vodafone UK ROM with Android Kernel Version: 2.16.405.1 CL223106 release-keys.  Unfortunately, this particular firmware prohibits any OTA updates or even manual updates and it was a nightmare trying to track down the problem.  Luckily I fell upon this [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.formortals.com/google-android-6-stage-update-process/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The tablet wars are not a foregone conclusion</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/the-tablet-wars-are-not-a-foregone-conclusion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.formortals.com/the-tablet-wars-are-not-a-foregone-conclusion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Ou</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=1564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marco Arment spent a hell of a lot of time trying to make the simple point that the tablet wars are a foregone conclusion in favor of Apple.  The thing that stuck out about his review of a review is that it spends so much time frothing at the mouth because someone said something nice [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.formortals.com/the-tablet-wars-are-not-a-foregone-conclusion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Angry Birds for Chrome browser review</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/angry-birds-for-chrome-browser-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.formortals.com/angry-birds-for-chrome-browser-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 03:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Ou</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=1559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just noticed that they now have Angry Birds for the Chrome web browser for free.  I own the $5 version for the Intel App store and wanted to see how this version compares so here are my impressions. The good It&#8217;s free. Installs very quickly with a few clicks. The bad No full screen [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.formortals.com/angry-birds-for-chrome-browser-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Strange that YouTube is crashing on Google Chrome</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/strange-that-youtube-is-crashing-on-google-chrome/</link>
		<comments>http://www.formortals.com/strange-that-youtube-is-crashing-on-google-chrome/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 02:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Ou</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=1301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For some reason, YouTube is crashing on Google Chrome version 6.0.472.62 but not Internet Explorer 8.  It spits out the following error. 500 Internal Server Error Sorry, something went wrong. A team of highly trained monkeys has been dispatched to deal with this situation. If you see them, show them this information: o1H57wyNth9p-wkd-sk_FQYd5-ktj5G2kTtiy0dThZetVCC-s_-pGZhq2NzZ aZwBFFvZ0W4Pkb7pq25o1K429CgafaQzMTXcEA1rReZrOZFwCzC0sAe5SkJi UiVRNqCC-6ozl4v0n_iKaYzDI-Rbm5Cf4yf1fFeb4YsSxPDJYoCSK-LLLbzK cpFjr9_UrRyy0UuzxQ8TJw0x_hzj6r4cW4LIsRyq8J-9YCiL-g3PUjuqTmC4 [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.formortals.com/strange-that-youtube-is-crashing-on-google-chrome/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s Matt Cutts hypocritical on privacy?</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/googles-matt-cutts-hypocritical-on-privacy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.formortals.com/googles-matt-cutts-hypocritical-on-privacy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 14:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=1157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matt Cutts, who is more or less the &#8220;face of Google&#8221; to the IT industry, has changed his Facebook profile to not allow his data to be shared with other Web sites with the new Open Graph system. I find this ironic, because Google is just about the biggest &#8220;Big Brother&#8221; on the Internet. I [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.formortals.com/googles-matt-cutts-hypocritical-on-privacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google probably pulling out of China</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/google-probably-pulling-out-of-china/</link>
		<comments>http://www.formortals.com/google-probably-pulling-out-of-china/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 04:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=1087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is huge. Google is looking like they will pull out of China. In a nutshell, someone’s been trying to break into the Gmail accounts of Chinese human rights activists (Google won’t say so, but no doubt it is the Chinese government), so Google is looking to shut down in China if the government won’t [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.formortals.com/google-probably-pulling-out-of-china/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s so new about the Nexus One business model?</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/whats-so-new-about-the-nexus-one-busines-model/</link>
		<comments>http://www.formortals.com/whats-so-new-about-the-nexus-one-busines-model/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 06:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Ou</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=1085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Update &#8211; Google ETF is actually $550 on top of the $180 you already paid!  So if you pull out early, you&#8217;ll have to pay $730 total! I know Justin was impressed with the business model Google&#8217;s new Nexus One phone, but I really don&#8217;t see how it&#8217;s any different.  You can buy the phone [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.formortals.com/whats-so-new-about-the-nexus-one-busines-model/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Google Phone&#8221; &#8211; a new front in Net Neutrality?</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/google-phone-a-new-front-in-net-neutrality/</link>
		<comments>http://www.formortals.com/google-phone-a-new-front-in-net-neutrality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 19:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=1082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s fairly well understood that Google&#8217;s idea of &#8220;Net Neutrality&#8221; is to view the telco as a &#8220;dumb pipe&#8221; and nothing more. Looking over the barrage of reports of the &#8220;Google Phone&#8221; that have come out over the last few days, I have come to realize that most analysts are completely blinded by the device [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.formortals.com/google-phone-a-new-front-in-net-neutrality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can Google be trusted with DNS?</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/can-google-be-trusted-with-dns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.formortals.com/can-google-be-trusted-with-dns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DNS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=1065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, Google has opened up its own, free, public DNS server. The sales pitch is that their DNS server is faster than your ISP&#8217;s, and therefore, you will save a ton of speed browsing the Web using their DNS server. Fair enough. But something occurred to me, just as I was about to change my [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.formortals.com/can-google-be-trusted-with-dns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Snagging YouTube videos from the cache</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/snagging-youtube-videos-from-cache/</link>
		<comments>http://www.formortals.com/snagging-youtube-videos-from-cache/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 06:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Ou</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Update 6-22-2009 &#8211; Looks like Google stopped hard drive caching on their 720P content.  Ironically, that&#8217;s the content that needs the caching the most but I guess they want to keep people from snagging the 720P clips. Update 11/20/2009 &#8211; The cache for 720P or even 1080P content is working again. With skyrocketing bandwidth costs [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.formortals.com/snagging-youtube-videos-from-cache/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

