Archive

Archive for the ‘AT&T’ Category

Samsung Intercept Review

October 12th, 2010 4 comments


I recently fought with AT&T as a carrier and after reaching the end of my 2 year contract, I finally decided to change cellular providers to Sprint. While AT&T has a great reputation elsewhere, in my location, they have failed to provide 3G coverage and even have had outages as of late due to an influx of population related to the annual arrival of college students.

Coincidentally at the same time my contract was just about up, my Samsung Eternity suffered from a flaw in the screen that wouldn’t allow for me to dial from the right side of the screen. When having to dial a number composed of mostly sixes, I decided that my phone could no longer be of use and so I went in search of another phone.

I have chose to look to the Samsung Intercept as the answer to my prayers. The phone has a 3.2” touch screen with a full qwerty keyboard that is easily usable by even my larger sized hands. The Phone features the Android 2.1 Operating System with Google connectivity. Many things about the Android OS makes the phone great. After logging into my gmail account and porting over my contacts, my contacts needed some serious sorting, but everything was there and linking contacts seemed relatively easy.

The phone seemed to be sluggish at times. The processor is noticeably slower than the Epic and other more expensive phones. The phone even seems a bit more sluggish than the older Samsung Moment. Over all the feel of the phone is rather cheap compared to similar priced phones. Part of this could be because of the licensing of Google’s android. One thing that both the Epic and the Intercept seem to have issues with is home row of soft keys. I have seen an Epic which already has these keys not functioning the majority of the time. Although having access to TV as well as several apps from the Android market made the phone feel much more usable, the thoughts that the Android was a mobile internet device first and a phone second was quite frustrating. A few other items that nagged at me was the inability to change to notification settings to include custom ring tones. I could easily assign a custom ring tone to a contact, but when having 300 contacts, setting these up was a bit too much of a task than what I was willing to take on.

One additional feature that I had with my Samsung Eternity that I was hoping to get away from on my Samsung Intercept was pocket-dialing. I would lock the phone and simply by sliding the phone into my pocket, it would unlock and start surfing the web or some other task to which I was unaware of.  Apparently there is a copy of some Armymen game that I have yet to download because of this.

On a much more positive note, the integration of apps where one could easily upload and send off a picture taken by the phone is very much welcome. The Android OS makes most of this possible.  The older propriety OS on the Samsung Eternity didn’t seem to have as much integration.

While the phone has many advantages that make it a great device for connecting to the web and creating a great online experience, putting the phone functionality as a secondary feature makes the Samsung Intercept more of that phone that you want if you don’t care about talking on the phone. But for that web-centric integration device, the Intercept still does pretty well. But on a personal note, I would recommend saving your money for a HTC Evo or a Samsung Epic if you want your Android phone.  My personal bad review of the Intercept is not so much because of the weakness of the phone, but the weakness of the phone compared to the predecessor.  The Samsung Intercept screen is not as clean or crisp as the Samsung Moment.  The construction of the phone feels poorer compared to the Moment.  In fact, the inferiority of this phone almost makes me think that Samsung pushed the phone to keep an option open for the mid-range phone while really driving people to consider the Galaxy S phones.    So while this phone is in and of itself not a terrible phone, the fact that the device is a step down in quality yet in the same tier as the Moment does not please me and that is why I definitely feel that Samsung has lost my business at this time.

One late development that I have had with the phone is that the screen has a flaw and does not respond to touch in certain sections.  This is a second of Samsung’s devices which has me concerned about their quality at this time.  I definitely feel burnt by Samsung in this matter, but fortunately my carrier Sprint was ready and willing to fix the problem and replace the phone without any restocking fee.  So I will be doing a review of the HTC Evo 4 soon.

Categories: AT&T, Mobile, Reviews Tags:

ISPs have a duty to block malicious traffic

July 28th, 2009 4 comments

AT&T and other ISPs stops DDoS attack from 4chanMass media and blogosphere hysteria ensued after several ISPs (including AT&T) responded to customer complaints and blocked an IP address that was transmitting massive amounts of Denial of Service (DoS) traffic. For something as routine as and essential as blocking a malicious attack from a computer on the Internet, all hell broke loose late Sunday evening and early Monday morning because the IP address belonged to a popular image sharing site called 4chan whose members are infamous for perpetrating porn flooding pranks on YouTube as well as organizing DoS attacks against other websites.

Read the rest at DigitalSociety.org

A good bonus service from AT&T DSL, free nationwide hotspot access

March 30th, 2009 1 comment

I travel quite a bit these days because of my job, and I have been noticing more and more than I can get AT&T hotspot service at places like Starbucks or many airports and some hotels.  In the past, one would have to pay $20 per month for T-Mobile hotspot services or cough up $10 or more per day for Wi-Fi access.  Now if you’re an AT&T DSL customer, you get this service for free which is really convenient.  Even if you have 2G or 3G data service, you will still want to use the much lower latency Wi-Fi access when it is available.

While this Wi-Fi service is nothing new and I’m not making news here, it’s good to point this out for people since not everyone knows about it.  The coverage seems to be getting better over time.  So if you’re already an AT&T DSL customer, simply use your username and the domain you belong to which you can pull down from a menu such as SBCGlobal.net.  Then you use the same DSL password you use for your PPPoE account.

Categories: AT&T, Internet, Mobile Tags:

AT&T joins Green Grid and brings first Energy Star set-top boxes

August 1st, 2008 1 comment

If I was still blogging at ZDNet, I’d file this under my old Energy Efficiency category.  It’s been nearly a year ago since I covered the Green Grid at Linux World and I know the folks who head up that consortium pretty well and it’s definitely a worthwhile cause.  I recall raising the concern that many IT departments don’t really pay energy costs and it doesn’t factor in to their department’s bottom line so it’s good to see that they’re championing the concept of some sort of corporate Energy Czar.

It’s obvious when energy is being wasted, it goes beyond the IT budget and affects the company’s bottom line not to mention the environmental impact.  I’ll also have to give myself a shameless plug to my print article going up for FedTech Magazine middle of August on “Power Management: Beyond the hype“.  Sorry, no linky here since it’s on this ancient thing that old folks called “paper” (just kidding, I like paper, really, I do!)

Anyhow, what’s more good news is that large telecoms like AT&T are joining the Green Grid and they’re bringing us energy efficient IPTV Set-Top Boxes.  The more corporations that join Green Grid, the better.  Aside from the energy savings, I don’t know anyone who likes a hot and noisy Set-Top Boxes

Hey that reminds me, I’m in the process of building a sub 30 watt server terabyte gigabit NAS with wire speed performance, and no you didn’t read that wrong.  I know I haven’t put up any interesting PC projects lately but bear with me, I’ve been busy with the new job.

Categories: AT&T, Energy efficiency, Policy Tags:

Free hotspot from Apple and AT&T? How about free hotspot anywhere!

May 2nd, 2008 12 comments

Nathan McFeters has an interesting post (original story from MacRumors) on how Apple and AT&T are using a simple HTTP header from the iPhone as a form of Access Control to grant Apple iPhones free hotspot service.  It doesn’t take much to figure out how to spoofed that HTTP header by any computer which will allow you to quickly gain free Wi-Fi service.

But I thought about it for a second and thought hey, it’s no worse than MAC filtering which is universally used at every for-fee hotspots.  The right sniffer and the right script can quickly change your MAC address to one that’s already logged in from some other user who already paid to gain access.  Just find a user on one end of the terminal, get the MAC address, then go to the other end where you’re waiting for your airplane so that your MAC addresses aren’t conflicting with each other on the same Access Point.

Sigh, I’ve been talking about how to secure a for-fee hotspot with 802.1x more than three years ago but I haven’t seen any takers yet.  I’ve also been advocating an anonymous secure hotspot more than a year ago.  If you don’t think this is a big deal, read this on sidejacking and read how even SSL doesn’t necessarily solve the problem.  Heck I’m in the process of converting www.ForMortals.com to auto redirect everything to HTTPS SSL mode.

Categories: Apple, AT&T, Wireless LAN Tags: