<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Technology for Mortals &#187; Apple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.formortals.com/category/companies/apple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.formortals.com</link>
	<description>Because technology isn&#039;t just for geeks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 06:16:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The tablet wars are not a foregone conclusion</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/the-tablet-wars-are-not-a-foregone-conclusion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.formortals.com/the-tablet-wars-are-not-a-foregone-conclusion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Ou</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=1564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marco Arment spent a hell of a lot of time trying to make the simple point that the tablet wars are a foregone conclusion in favor of Apple.  The thing that stuck out about his review of a review is that it spends so much time frothing at the mouth because someone said something nice [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.formortals.com/the-tablet-wars-are-not-a-foregone-conclusion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple&#8217;s 3.5&#8243; tablet costs $749</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/apples-3-5-tablet-costs-749/</link>
		<comments>http://www.formortals.com/apples-3-5-tablet-costs-749/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 11:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Ou</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=1561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apparently, Apple&#8217;s 3.5 inch tablet with 3G and phone capability (what Apple calls their &#8220;iPhone&#8221;) with 16 or 32 MB storage costs $649 or $749.  These devices are nice, but it&#8217;s against my principles to pay that kind of profit margin for a device like this. If I was in the market for a phone [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.formortals.com/apples-3-5-tablet-costs-749/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MacBook Air 2011 Model Launch Immenent</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/macbook-air-2011-model-launch-immenent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.formortals.com/macbook-air-2011-model-launch-immenent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 20:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Baumli</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac OS X]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Notebooks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=1549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Macbook Air is all but imminent for an early June launch.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.formortals.com/macbook-air-2011-model-launch-immenent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MacBook Pro 2011, The Good and the Bad</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/macbook-pro-2011-the-good-and-the-bad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.formortals.com/macbook-pro-2011-the-good-and-the-bad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 00:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Baumli</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Batteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Notebooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Processors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=1444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A quick overview of Apple's latest notebook revision.  The Macbook Pro 2011 edition with what good it brings as well as what seems to be missing. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.formortals.com/macbook-pro-2011-the-good-and-the-bad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Novell&#8217;s Patents and Why CDTN Holdings Wants Them.</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/novells-patents-and-why-cdtn-holdings-wants-them/</link>
		<comments>http://www.formortals.com/novells-patents-and-why-cdtn-holdings-wants-them/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 01:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Baumli</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Backup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oracle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sun]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=1396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The web was a buzz earlier today with news that Microsoft wasn&#8217;t the only company being involved in CDTN Holdings and some including ZDNet and ComputerWorld blogger Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols tried to speculate just what patents each of the member companies of CDTN Holdings would want and why. First many thought that VMware would jump [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.formortals.com/novells-patents-and-why-cdtn-holdings-wants-them/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>4th generation iPod touch pressures the android device market</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/4th-generation-ipod-touch-makes-android-mini-tablets-obsolete/</link>
		<comments>http://www.formortals.com/4th-generation-ipod-touch-makes-android-mini-tablets-obsolete/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 16:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Ou</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=1243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Speaking as someone who would never install iTunes on his computer (which rules out Apple products for me), I can&#8217;t help but notice that the new iPod touch just made all the android mini tablets like the Ramos W7 or even the Dell Streak obsolete. There&#8217;s no 3G capability, but you can get a MiFi [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.formortals.com/4th-generation-ipod-touch-makes-android-mini-tablets-obsolete/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPhone 4 can&#8217;t actually hit full 802.11g speeds much less 802.11n</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/iphone-4-cant-actually-hit-full-802-11g-speeds-much-less-802-11n/</link>
		<comments>http://www.formortals.com/iphone-4-cant-actually-hit-full-802-11g-speeds-much-less-802-11n/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 12:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Ou</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=1219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[iPhone 4 Wi-Fi performance benchmarks We were surprised to see that Anandtech only managed to get Wi-Fi performance of 7.2 Mbps downstream and 7.96 Mbps upstream using the SpeedTest.net app for iPhone OS. We ran our own tests and found that the iPhone 4 can sustain 20 Mbps over Wi-Fi. These are much better results, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.formortals.com/iphone-4-cant-actually-hit-full-802-11g-speeds-much-less-802-11n/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some noteworthy posts &#8211; June 9 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/some-noteworthy-posts-june9-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.formortals.com/some-noteworthy-posts-june9-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 14:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Ou</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=1187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple faking 489 to 815 PPI on iPhone 4 ads After examining the iPhone 4 advertisements, it appears that Apple is showing 3 to 5 times the Pixels Per Inch (PPI) in their ads when they should only be showing 2 times the PPI. Estimate of network bandwidth for iPhone 4 FaceTime From my estimates, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.formortals.com/some-noteworthy-posts-june9-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can your tablet digitizer pass the bumble bee test?</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/can-your-tablet-digitizer-pass-the-bumble-bee-test/</link>
		<comments>http://www.formortals.com/can-your-tablet-digitizer-pass-the-bumble-bee-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Ou</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=1161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This video clip of world-famous pianist Lang Lang playing Flight of the bumble bee&#8221; has become the next viral video crazy. Not only is it funny, it shows just how good the iPad&#8217;s multi-touch digitizer and OS is if it can register the fingers of Lang Lang.  Lot&#8217;s of companies make touch screen devices and even [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.formortals.com/can-your-tablet-digitizer-pass-the-bumble-bee-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>YouTube HTML5 slightly better, but still bad</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/youtube-html5-slightly-better-but-still-bad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.formortals.com/youtube-html5-slightly-better-but-still-bad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Ou</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=1134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier last month, I found that YouTube’s HTML5 beta wasn’t even worthy of being beta.  Three weeks after that, Jan Ozer ran some CPU performance tests between YouTube Flash and HTML5 on Mac OS X and Safari and found that CPU performance was better on HTML5.  However, my tests (using same 720P video posted by [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.formortals.com/youtube-html5-slightly-better-but-still-bad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

