<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Technology for Mortals &#187; Adobe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.formortals.com/category/companies/adobe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.formortals.com</link>
	<description>Because technology isn&#039;t just for geeks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 06:16:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>YouTube HTML5 slightly better, but still bad</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/youtube-html5-slightly-better-but-still-bad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.formortals.com/youtube-html5-slightly-better-but-still-bad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Ou</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=1134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier last month, I found that YouTube’s HTML5 beta wasn’t even worthy of being beta.  Three weeks after that, Jan Ozer ran some CPU performance tests between YouTube Flash and HTML5 on Mac OS X and Safari and found that CPU performance was better on HTML5.  However, my tests (using same 720P video posted by [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.formortals.com/youtube-html5-slightly-better-but-still-bad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>YouTube HTML5 not even worth of being beta</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/youtube-html5-not-even-worth-of-being-beta/</link>
		<comments>http://www.formortals.com/youtube-html5-not-even-worth-of-being-beta/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Ou</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=1092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google is beta testing HTML5 for video playback on YouTube, and my initial impressions of the technology are not good at all.  A few months earlier, I couldn&#8217;t get Internet Explorer, Firefox, or Google Chrome to run HTML5 video.  I am able to get the latest version of Chrome to render the video, but the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.formortals.com/youtube-html5-not-even-worth-of-being-beta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>90% of you run an insecure version of flash</title>
		<link>http://www.formortals.com/90-of-you-run-an-insecure-version-of-flash/</link>
		<comments>http://www.formortals.com/90-of-you-run-an-insecure-version-of-flash/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 00:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George Ou</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.formortals.com/?p=690</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last Friday, a new version of Adobe Flash came out which patched the most recent critical flaws in Flash Player. Yet because the update process isn&#8217;t automatic, most of you have not updated your Flash Player in your web browser. The fact that Adobe makes the manual update process a pain to use and forces [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.formortals.com/90-of-you-run-an-insecure-version-of-flash/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

