Search
Wednesday, January 07, 2009 ..:: Home ::.. Register  Login
Blog roll

Topic search

UsersOnline
Membership Membership:
Latest New User Latest: ginnyihmv
New Today New Today: 1
New Yesterday New Yesterday: 0
User Count Overall: 121

People Online People Online:
Visitors Visitors: 0
Members Members: 0
Total Total: 0

Online Now Online Now:

Blogs
Oct 4

Written by: George Ou
10/4/2008 12:29 AM

[UPDATE 5:38PM - enabled full battery stretch2 mode and got more battery life]
It appears that Windows XP will beat Windows Vista on notebook battery consumption.  Using the 6-cell battery rated for 56.16 watt*hours with an actual 58.26 watt*hours, the Lenovo X200 in its absolutely minimal1 power state will get barely over 8 hours of battery life while Windows Vista in its minimal power state gets about 6.5 7.6 hours.  In these minimal states, it seems that Windows XP will allow the computer to drop down to 7.28 watts while Windows Vista only allows the same computer to drop to  7.67 watts.

With battery stretch turned off but Vista Aero still disabled, XP drops to 5.96 hours and Vista drops to 5.628 hours when I'm blogging on the computer with Wi-Fi and Bluetooth on.  When I'm surfing the web and actively rendering web pages, XP drops to 5.5 hours while Vista drops to 5.22 hours.

It's very hard to make these measurements because there are so many factors that determine power consumption and battery life.  Vista does seem to crank the CPU a little more but it's doing a lot more.

I've have always noticed that Windows Vista keeps the CPU slightly busier in idle than Windows XP and that may explain the power difference.  Is this annoying?  Sure, and it must give laptop designers fits because this makes it harder to hit the target battery life goals.  Does this make me want to go back to XP?  A little, but I do like the way the fonts look in Vista and I like the start menu better in the way you can launch programs by just typing in a few letters.  A fresh install of Vista is stable enough these days that I've decided to stick with Vista, but the reduced battery life bothers me a little.

It would be interesting to see how a major Linux distribution will do on this laptop, but I don't have time for that right now with my work.

1.  Minimal state meaning the display is on minimum brightness, Bluetooth and Wi-Fi radios off, hard drive spun down, CPU at minimum P and C state, and every other trick in the book.  It's not that you can actually use the computer in this state, but it's a useful measurement to figure out one extreme of battery life.

2.  Battery stretch turns off speakers, lowers color depth to 16 bit, lowers brightness to the minimum, lowers CPU to the minimum performance, and a few other minor things.  Vista icons do look horrendous in this mode, but the X200 LCD is glare free so I can still watch movies on a dark air plane in this mode if I enable the audio.

Tags:

4 comments so far...

Re: Windows XP versus Vista battery tests for Lenovo X200

openSUSE 11.0 x86_64 run VirtualBox with Vista guest VM (cough)

>It would be interesting to see how a major Linux distribution will do on this laptop

By dietrich on   10/4/2008 2:37 AM

Re: Windows XP versus Vista battery tests for Lenovo X200

George, I suspect if you turned off auto defrag, indexing and perhaps superfetch (not so sure about that one though) you might improve battery life.

I assume you've gone through and customized all the power options for your laptop, but if you haven't, you might get some help there. Of course you could always fire off an email to Ed Bott. I'm sure he could give you some advice ;)

By notgonnatellya on   10/4/2008 11:26 AM

I've tweaked everything except superfetch

Defrag wasn't running, indexing was set to maximum power savings when plugged in and I wasn't indexing anything, but superfetch wasn't disabled.

I have customized all the power options that I could find. I even enabled "battery stretch" which shuts down everything and I can't get the system to use as little power as it uses in XP.

By host on   10/4/2008 1:45 PM

Yet another Ding in the OS that is Vista

Any more and I think I would turn that OS in for hail damage.

While this is true, Microsoft has said for many years that their worst competitor is their prior releases.

By nuCrash on   10/4/2008 2:48 PM

Your name:
Title:
Comment:
Add Comment    Cancel  

Links

Blog_Archive

New_Blog
You must be logged in and have permission to create or edit a blog.

Search_Blog
Print  

Copyright 2008 by George Ou or Justin James   Terms Of Use  Privacy Statement
DotNetNuke® is copyright 2002-2009 by DotNetNuke Corporation